Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.Over recent years, Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) have seen major advances, closely related to the increase in the number of satellites and the improvement and development of signal processing algorithms. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.

Copyright of Research Journal of Agricultural Science is the property of Banat University of Agricultural Sciences & Veterinary Medicine Timisoara and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission.

Raw data post-processing was done with a Leica Geo Office Combined Programme. Land surveys were done with GPS equipment from Leica series 1200, and the equipment was downloaded with a Leica Geo Office Combined Programme WGS 1984 coordinates were turned into Stereographic 1970 coordinates with a TransDatRo Programme, and data were processed with TopoLT and AutoCAD 2016 Programmes.

To check the correctness of measurements, we also read through the static method for other 5 high order geodesic signals (soil pyramids): Signal Dealul Viilor, Signal Dealul Mare, Signal La Matringa, Signal La Prapat and Signal Poiana lui Iancu. The 37 Feno landmarks were read through radio waves.

After the static post-processing, we thickened the network by setting and reading the Feno landmarks. After measurements in the field, we acquired RINNEX data from the Cadastre and Real Estate Publicity Offices in Timiș, Făget and Arad, to post-process data and acquire WGS 1984 coordinates from post-processing. An important parameter was the stationing time for each landmark apart, taking into account the longest base. To materialise the works in the field, we prepared a GPS campaign taking into account several parameters.

The concrete landmarks were made manually, observing the current norms. To do so, we marked soil points with concrete landmarks in four localities (Secaș, Crivobara, Vizma and Checheș) and we used 37 Feno landmarks to thicken the network: we set 8 pairs of concrete landmarks, 2 pairs per locality.

Abstract: This paper presents the thickening of a geodesic GPS network through the static method in Secaș, Timiș County, Romania.

Leica geo office static processing